What Will Life Look Like in 100 Years?

What Will Life Look Like in 100 Years?

  23 Jul 2025

Key takeaways

Australia has transformed beyond recognition in the last 100 years.

The next 100 will be even more dramatic.

The key message: We are already building the future through today’s choices.

From housing and healthcare to migration and technology, the seeds we plant now will determine the shape of 2125.


A century ago, Australians were still recovering from World War I.

There was no television, no supermarkets, and no suburbs as we know them today.

People lived closer to the city because that’s where all the jobs were.

Most women stayed at home, the average household had several children, and migration was largely from the British Isles.

Now, rather than looking back a century, fast-forward 100 years.

Can we even begin to grasp what Australia might look like in 2125?

While it’s tempting to say the future is unknowable, in reality, many of the foundations of tomorrow are being laid today.

In a recent episode of Demographics Decoded, Simon Kuestenmacher and I unpacked what life could look like in 100 years, drawing on demographic and social trends, housing patterns, and historical context to paint a picture of Australia’s potential future.

Here’s what we uncovered.

For weekly insights and strategic advice, subscribe to the Demographics Decoded podcast, where we will continue to explore these trends and their implications in greater detail.

Subscribe now on your favourite Podcast player:

The shape of our cities: still familiar, just denser

If someone from 1925 looked at a map of Australia today, they’d instantly recognise the major cities: Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth.

What might surprise them is that despite a fivefold population increase, we haven’t really created any new major cities, except for the Gold Coast.

Simon pointed this out perfectly: “If the time traveller from 1925 arrived in 2025, they’d feel very familiar with the map. That in itself is quite spectacular, we added people but not new cities.”

So, what does this mean for 2125?

We’re likely to see existing cities expand rather than entirely new urban centers emerge.

Building a new city requires immense political will, planning, and infrastructure investment, and right now, there’s little appetite for that.

Unless that changes, we’ll continue to funnel millions more people into the same cities, stretching infrastructure, public transport, and housing supply.

The Gold Coast offers a rare case study.

Once a retirement destination dubbed “God’s waiting room,” it’s now evolving into a self-sustaining economic and cultural hub, a proper city in its own right.

“It’s a success story,” Simon noted. “It might not be for everyone, but it added choice to our urban landscape.”

In the next century, we’ll need two or three more ‘Gold Coasts’.

Smaller families, longer lives, and a shift in the social fabric

Family life has changed over the last century, and that’s only going to accelerate.

Fertility rates continue to fall, with many Australians choosing to have fewer children, or none at all.

Back in the 1920s, large families were the norm. Today, a two-child household is the average.

In 2125, the norm may be one-child or even child-free families.

But there’s a twist.

Simon floated the possibility of a swing back. “If housing becomes more affordable and wealth is abundant, people might feel more optimistic and decide to have more kids again.”

In other words, it’s not just about culture, it’s about confidence.

Meanwhile, lifespans are expected to increase dramatically. With better healthcare and breakthroughs in biotechnology, living to 100 could be common by the end of the century.

But this brings a big challenge: how do we care for an ageing population?

By 2080, today’s millennials will be retirees.

And they’re a bigger cohort than the baby boomers.

Our aged care system, already under pressure, just won’t cope without a dramatic transformation.

“We’ll hit a crisis point in about 15 years when the number of 85+ Australians doubles,” Simon warned. “And that’s just the beginning.”

It raises tough questions.

Will euthanasia become a more accepted end-of-life option?

Will we work into our 80s?

What role will families play in caring for each other as geographic mobility increases and fewer adult children live near ageing parents?

We’ll need new systems, such as community-based care, smart homes that support independence, and perhaps even AI-assisted eldercare, to help people live healthier, longer, and with dignity.

The future of work: knowledge-based, tech-driven

In 1925, most people worked in agriculture, factories, or trades.

Today, it is services, finance, health, and technology.

Fast forward to 2125 and you can expect the knowledge economy to dominate even more.

In fact most people will have jobs we can’t even imagine yet, but they’ll be intellectual in nature.

With AI and automation likely to replace many routine and physical tasks, human value will increasingly lie in creative thinking, empathy, leadership, and effective decision-making.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *